![]() | ![]() |
![]() | |||||||
| |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||
Home > Free Online Inspiration > Books Online > The Path > Chapter 24 |
|||
|
|
Books Online
by J. Donald Walters (Swami Kriyananda) Chapter 24 True Teaching Is Individual |
|||||||
| One
sometimes hears the lament, "There are too many denominations in Christendom."
Yet I dare say that even if there were only one, there would still be as
many different forms of Christianity as there are Christians. For every
man's understanding is conditioned by his own special experiences, his aspirations,
his outlook on life-in short, by what he is. He might recite the
Nicene Creed in church every Sunday, yet attach meanings to it that would
surprise some of his fellow worshipers. In reciting the Lord's Prayer, children
have been heard to say, "Give us this day our jelly bread," and,
"Lead us not into Penn Station." We smile at their innocence.
But are we so sure that we ourselves really know all that is intended
in the Lord's Prayer, or in the Credo?
The same problem confronts us in our efforts to understand one another. Even the people to whom we feel closest remain closed books to us on certain levels of their being. What, then, of a God-realized master? Is it worthwhile even trying to comprehend his vast nature? Whenever fellow disciples spoke to me of trying to "understand" Master, I would marvel. It struck me as rather like trying to understand the universe! But the task that Infinity has placed squarely in our laps is, "Understand thyself-know thyself." To study the life of a master with the purpose, not of understanding him, but of obtaining deeper insight into one's own true nature, into one's own potential for divine unfoldment: This is wise use of the faculty of discrimination. Master himself was, to each one of us, like a flawless mirror. He held up to our inner gaze, not his opinions of us, but the subtle reactions of our own higher natures. His perfect self-transcendence never ceased to amaze me. In another person's company he actually, in a sense, became that person. I don't mean that in our company he assumed our weaknesses, our pettiness, our moods of anger or despondency. What he showed us, rather, was the silent watcher deep within our own selves. An amazing feature of my own relationship with him was that I could never clearly remember what he looked like. I needed a photograph to bring his image clearly to mind. Even among photographs of him, I have never seen any two alike. When he is shown posing with someone else, in some subtle way he actually looks like that person. Shown with Seņor Portes Gil, the President of Mexico, he looks like Seņor Gil. Posed with Amelita Galli-Curci, the great opera singer, he looks strangely like her. Photographed with Goodwin J. Knight, Lieutenant Governor of California, he appears almost to be Mr. Knight's alter ego. (45) Standing with any disciple, he seems to become that disciple. One wonders how a single face could display such a wide variety of expressions. But of course it was not his face that changed, but the consciousness behind it. Master went a step beyond seeing the god in each of us: He became that god, in order that we might see our own divine potential for ourselves, and understand better how the Lord wanted to express Himself through our lives.
Ah, Master!
If only I had comprehended as clearly then as I do now the magnificence
of your gift to us! But I suppose, had I done so, by this time I would be
making the same lament. For evolution never ceases, until at last it embraces
eternity.
In his training of
us Master's teaching was individual also. It was not that he altered
his basic teachings to suit our personal needs. It was his emphasis rather
that varied. To some he stressed attitudes of service; to others, deep
inwardness. To one he emphasized the need for greater joy; to another,
for less levity. His emphasis was to a great extent too subtle to be phrased
in words. He conveyed it by some intonation of the voice, by the expression
in his eyes, by a tilt of the head. What he said to one person he might
never say to anyone else. In a very real sense he was, to each of us,
our very own, personal, divine friend.
In our work, one might
have expected him to honor that basic principle of every well-run institution:
"Make the best use of individual talent." But to Master this
practice would have meant using his disciples. His true concern,
always, was for our spiritual needs. Sometimes he would actually take
us away from some important assignment-one, perhaps, for which no one
else could be found-simply to help us spiritually. Sometimes, too, he
placed people in positions for which they weren't qualified, with a view
to prompting them, in their struggle to meet his expectations, to develop
needed spiritual qualities. At other times he gave us work we disliked-not
particularly because we would be good for that work (I recall a job of
carpentry that he put me on once: For every time my hammer hit the nail,
there must have been nine others that it missed), but because the work
would be good for us. Perhaps it was that we needed to learn some
spiritual quality-for example, to overcome unwillingness.
Sometimes he would
not place people in positions for which they were eminently qualified,
simply because they no longer needed those particular experiences to grow
spiritually. One might have thought, for instance, that he would have
called upon all his most advanced disciples to help him in the ministry.
In fact he did say that he appointed as ministers only those who in former
lives had developed the requisite spiritual qualifications. But along
with those qualifications was the still-more-pressing question of what
we ourselves needed, to grow. Speaking to me once of Rajarsi Janakananda,
his most highly advanced disciple, he said, "He was leading a center
in Kansas City years ago, but I asked him to give it up. Service in that
capacity was no longer necessary for his spiritual development."
Sister Gyanamata,
his most advanced woman disciple, and a person of deep wisdom, could have
rendered enormous assistance by giving lectures, teaching classes, and
writing articles for the SRF magazine. But Master never asked her to serve
in any such role. That kind of work simply wasn't necessary for her spiritual
growth. In fact, I once tried to get her, along with several other advanced
disciples, to write articles for Self-Realization Magazine. My
effort was in response to Master's request that I try to make this bimonthly
publication more attractive and helpful to the general reader, with "short,
practical articles," as he put it, "on the techniques and principles
of right living-articles designed to help people on all levels: physically,
mentally, and spiritually." I was trying to enlist as many as possible
in this cause, and naturally thought that, the more spiritually developed
the writer, the better the article would be. But to my surprise, neither
Sister Gyanamata nor any of the others I hoped most to hear from responded
to my appeal. Indeed, this was my first confrontation with the truth that
a master's training is individual. My first, instinctive response ("Don't
they want to do Master's will?") conflicted with my awareness
that they must know a great deal more about his will than I did. I was
forced at last to conclude that, while Master wanted the magazine improved,
he didn't necessarily want every hand on deck to improve it. It was not
only a question of what he wanted, but of whom he wanted
it from.
My own deep-seated
desire had always been to share joy with others. Having suffered spiritually
myself, I felt deeply the spiritual sufferings of others, and longed to
do all I could to help assuage their sufferings. Master responded to this
deep inner longing of mine, and trained me from the beginning for public
service.
In January 1949 he
put me into office work, answering letters. I typed them in my room, since
at that time there was no separate office for the monks. At first my letters
tended to be too long.
"I once knew
a lady novelist," Master told me one day, by way of advice, "who
ended her letters, 'If I'd had more time, this letter would have been
shorter.'" He corrected me at other times, too, on the best ways
of presenting our teachings to others.
Not long after he'd
made me a letter writer, he asked me to study the complete set of the
SRF lessons. His stated reason for doing so amused me: "I want your
suggestions for their improvement." His real purpose, I knew, was
to get me to study the lessons as deeply as possible.
Soon thereafter he
also made me the official examiner. This job meant reviewing and grading
students' answers to the tests which, in those days, were sent out at
the end of each step of the lessons.
By these means Master
sought to give me a thorough grounding in his teachings.
In March 1949 he asked
me to write articles for our bimonthly magazine. I began writing under
the pen name Robert Ford. My first endeavor, "You Can Change Your
Personality," was featured in the May-June issue of that year.
One evening Master
sent for two or three of us, and talked at length about his work in India.
A strong intuition awakened within me that Master would someday send me
to that country. Eagerly I jotted down everything he said. A few days
later I saw him standing upstairs on his private porch.
"I have plans
for you, Walter," he remarked with a quiet smile.
Certain as to his
meaning, I was delighted. But after I'd left him, the thought came, "To
go to India would mean leaving Master!" The enormity of this threatened
loss threw me into a deep depression. "Master is my India!"
I cried silently. "What could I possibly find there that I haven't
already, right here?"
Gradually my mood
left me. As I grew calmer, I reflected that Master surely would want nothing
of me but what was spiritually for my best. Two days later I saw him again.
By this time I had banished my depression.
"No more moods,
now," Master said gently when we met. "Otherwise, how will you
be able to help people?"
Every year for the
next three years he made plans to go to India, and to take me with him.
Each time the trip was postponed. It was his death, finally, that canceled
it the third time. But I did get sent to India eventually, in 1958, and
there spent the better part of four years.
Sometime in February
or March 1949, Master instructed me to stand outside the Hollywood church
after the Sunday morning services, and shake hands with people as they
left. In his lessons he states that people exchange magnetism when shaking
hands. Thus, what Master wanted me to do was not merely greet people,
but act as his channel of blessings to others. The first time I tried
it, I felt so drained of energy I actually became dizzy. I suppose what
happened was that people unconsciously drew from me, in the consciousness
that I was serving as Master's representative.
"Master,"
I said later, "I don't believe I'm ready for this job." I explained
what had occurred.
"That is because
you are thinking of yourself," he replied. "Think of God, and
you will find His energy flowing through you."
His suggestion worked.
By holding to the thought of God, I discovered that I felt actually more
uplifted after shaking hands with the congregation than beforehand.
"When this 'I'
shall die," Master wrote once, in a rhymed couplet, "then shall
I know who am I."
One of my office jobs
was to send weekly advertisements to the newspapers to announce which
minister would be speaking at which church the next Sunday, and what his
sermon topic would be. Master had been lecturing fortnightly in our San
Diego church, alternating weekly between there and Hollywood. Of recent
months, however, he had taken to going to San Diego only occasionally.
The church members there, ever anxious to see him, were instructed to
check the church page of the San Diego Union every Saturday. Whenever
Master came, the church was full to overflowing.
One week in May I
was instructed to send in the announcement that Master would appear there
the following Sunday. It had been at least two months since the last time.
I smiled to think how delighted the congregation would be.
Saturday morning Bernard
came to my room with horrifying news. "Master can't go to San Diego
after all. He wants you to speak in his stead."
"Me! But
. . . but I've never lectured before in my life!"
"He also wants
you," Bernard continued with appalling detachment, "to give
a Kriya Yoga initiation afterwards."
"What! Why, I've
only attended one initiation!"
"Two," Bernard
corrected me. "Master also initiated you last October at Twenty-Nine
Palms-remember?"
"All right, two.
What difference does that make? I mean-well, of course I'll obey him,
but. . . . Oh, those poor people!"
"You'll only
have to initiate one of them," Bernard consoled me. "Here's
money for the bus. You'd better leave immediately."
In Encinitas, several
hours later, Rev. Michael (now Brother Bhaktananda) reviewed for me the
outlines of the Kriya initiation ceremony. I worked hard on my sermon,
also. With a sinking heart I drove down to San Diego the next morning.
In a little room behind the church I prayed desperately for help and guidance.
As the time for the service approached, I went and sat in a chair in the
center of the stage, as was the custom in those days. Through the closed
curtains I could distinctly hear the murmurs of a large and eagerly waiting
crowd.
The dreaded moment
arrived. I stood up. The curtains parted. My worse fears were realized:
The church was completely packed. People were standing in the aisles.
Others craned their necks to peer in through the windows. I could feel
their shock as an almost physical wave. Instead of their long-awaited
guru, here facing them was an unknown and rather lost-looking boy of twenty-two,
asking them if they were-still?-awake and ready. I felt so sorry for them
in their disappointment that I forgot the awkwardness of my own position.
If everyone there had walked out, I would have understood. But regular
meditation, I supposed, had made them gracious. No one left.
The Kriya initiation
that afternoon frightened me even more than the service had. Michelle
Evans, the lady I initiated, looked as terrified as I was-infected, as
she later admitted, by my own fear. But Master's blessings, powerfully
felt, soon dispelled all anxiety. The ceremony went smoothly. I returned
to Mt. Washington that afternoon bowed, perhaps, but unbloodied.
Later, Master received
compliments on my lecture. "Most of all," he reported, pleased,
"they liked your humility." I reflected that, under the circumstances,
humility had been virtually unavoidable!
From this time onward,
Master had me lecture regularly in the San Diego and Hollywood churches.
He referred to me publicly as "Reverend Walter," though the
actual formalities of ordination weren't completed until a year later.
"Your desire
to be happy," he often told us, "must include others' happiness."
I had always known in my heart that I would be called upon someday to
serve others through teaching and lecturing. But whether out of the humility
that Master sometimes praised in me, or from darker motives of unwillingness,
it was, I'm afraid, not a few years before I could bring myself to believe
that my lectures really did anyone any good.
Master, however, made
it clear that he expected me to take this responsibility seriously. "Sir,"
I once pleaded with him, "I don't want to be a lecturer!"
"You'd better
learn to like it," he replied pleasantly. "That is what you
will have to do."
At informal gatherings
of the monks he would usually direct his conversation to me-as if to get
me to absorb his philosophy to my depths. At such times I would think,
"It's because I'm so superficial that he won't let me close my eyes
and meditate in his presence." That was what I wanted to do. But
Master was responding to more deep-seated tendencies in my nature-and
was subtly emphasizing that the work of absorbing his philosophy, and
of sharing it with others, was what I myself needed, to grow.
(45) These
three photographs may be seen in two publications of Self-Realization
Fellowship: the Golden Anniversary booklet, and Paramhansa Yogananda,
in Memoriam (p. 81). |
|||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||